/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) writing task (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: writing task
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt33 - : Breen and Littlejohn (2000) stated three forms of negotiation that could be related to the results of this study. Students engaged in personal negotiation as a psychological process in order to understand texts / sources of information to start constructing their hypertexts. Once they knew what to do, they were involved in interactive negotiation which let them share, check, and clarify meaning about the writing task: i .e., in this case, their hypertext construction to conclude with the procedural negotiation which described their reaching agreement on decisions that contributed to improvement and socialize students' hypertext production as the main project carried out during the semester. The following figure represents the most representative
2
paper CO_CuadernosdeLingüísticaHispánicatxt66 - : Learners often feel the need of their performance being assessed on an ongoing basis prior to submission of their final product. This represents a distinct form of support, here named feedback support. In [38]Excerpt 6, feedback support being exchanged during a joint writing task can be observed:
Evaluando al candidato writing task:
1) negotiation: 4
writing task
Lengua:
Frec: 40
Docs: 32
Nombre propio: / 40 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.523 = ( + (1+2.32192809488736) / (1+5.35755200461808)));
Rechazado: mal tf-df: 125;
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| writing task |
: 70. Pino-Silva, J. (2007). The video-based short comment writing task. Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 320-329. : Basturkmen, H., & von Randow, J. (2014). Guiding the reader (or not) to re-create coherence: Observations on postgraduate student writing in an academic argumentative writing task.Journal of English for Academic Purposes,16, 14-22. : Chang, S. H., Wu, R. Y., y Weir, C. J. (2014). Examining the context and cognitive validity of the GEPT Advanced Writing Task 1: A comparison with real-life academic writing tasks. LTTC-CRELLA Collaboration Project RG-03. Taiwan. : Hale, G., Taylor, C., Bridgeman, B., Carson, J., Kroll, B., & Kantor, R. (1996). A study of writing task assigned in academic degree programs. Princenton: Educational Testing Service. : Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: an investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 459-479. : Martin, J., & Rothery, J. (1986a). What a functional approach to the writing task can show teachers about 'good writing'. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: research perspectives. (pp. 241-265). Norwoord, NJ: Ablex. : Scollon, R., Tsang, W.K., Li, D., Yung, V., and Jones, R. (1998). Voice, appropriation and discourse representation in a student writing task. Linguistics and Education, 9(3): 227-250. |